Largest GMO study in history confirms safety, cost benefits of GMOs

The largest GMO study in history, published last week in PLOS ONE, confirms that genetically modified crops have large, widespread benefits.

The review in question is a meta-analysis. This is a statistically rigorous study of studies, rather than a mere summary of the literature. Its authors, Matin Qaim and Wilhelm Klümper, both of Göttingen University, in Germany, went through all examinations of the agronomic and economic impacts of GM crops published in English between 1995 and March 2014.

The study found herbicide-tolerant crops have lower production costs—though this was not true for insect-resistant crops, where the need for less pesticide was offset by higher seed prices, and overall production costs were thus about the same as for unmodified crops. With both forms of modification, however, the yield rise was so great (9% above non-GM crops for herbicide tolerance and 25% above for insect resistance) that farmers who adopted GM crops made 69% higher profits than those who did not.

Dr Qaim and Dr Klümper found that GM crops do even better in poor countries than in rich ones. Farmers in developing nations who use the technology achieve yields 14 percentage points above those of GM farmers in the rich world. Pests and weeds are a bigger problem in poor countries, so GM confers bigger benefits.

Read full original article: Genetically modified crops: Field research

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jul 31, 2026, 08_05_37 AM
26% and far worse than during COVID: Under RFK Jr., Americans’ opinion of ‘revamped’ CDC hits an all-time low
Screenshot-2026-10-26-at-11.06.10-AM
Viewpoint: The organic, good-food, small-farm movement is seductive but wrongheaded. Here’s the sustainability and environmental case for industrial farming
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Screenshot-2026-10-24-121036
Many hospitals embrace longevity medicine. Are they separating science from hype?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
China Innovation Lightbulb 2
China’s 5-year plan to accelerate science innovation is putting the U.S. and Europe in the rearview mirror
Screenshot-2026-10-23-at-10.37.12-AM
Viewpoint: Drones, dollars and baby food: Critical innovations that anti-plastic ideologues willfully ignore
Cancer mRNA Vaccine Concept
'A new frontier': Though scorned by RFK Jr., personalized mRNA vaccine offers hope for many suffering from melanoma skin cancer
DOJ Emblem with Transgender Symbol
‘They’ve already decided what they want studies to say’: Questioning Trump’s plan to study whether people distressed about their sex are prone to violence
Crimson Drips Over the White House
In Trump administration redirect, U.S. steers NIH sharply away from biodefense and pandemic preparedness
West-Virginia-SNAP-Water-Bottle-Sticker
A ‘shining success’ or 'empty promises’: Two years along, West Virginians assess MAHA’s food promises
Healthy Food Sensitivity Test Collection
Viewpoint: That’ll be $300: The wellness industry’s junk science scam to ‘fix’ your immune system that isn’t broken
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 5.38
PFAS in Agriculture: Science, Uncertainty, and Risk Communication
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.