Anti-GMO campaigners take no issue with new crops created by soaking seeds or tissues in toxic chemicals or subjecting them to high fields of radiation to cause random damage and genetic changes. No opposition, no labels wanted, no protesters, no fear. But when changes are done precisely in a clean laboratory, hysteria breaks loose.
View the original article here: Huh? Activists embrace new foods mutated with toxic chemicals and radiation, reject safe GMOs
Huh? Activists embrace new foods mutated with toxic chemicals and radiation, reject safe GMOs
Kevin Folta | July 9, 2012
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
 |
Infographics | More... |
Infographic: Could gut bacteria help us diagnose and treat diseases? This is on the horizon thanks to CRISPR gene editing
Humans are never alone. Even in a room devoid of other people, they are always in the company of billions ...
Most Popular
Is tilapia a human-made freak that we should avoid — or an evolutionary rockstar? 
Viewpoint: Debunking organic food myths again… and again 
25 years of GMO crops: Economic, environmental and human health benefits 
Viewpoint: The organic food industry is a $180 billion marketing fraud 
Marrying your cousin? There may be evolutionary benefits 
How Wegovy and Ozempic could transform our food systems 
KFC developing world’s first bioprinted chicken nuggets for planned rollout in Russia in fall 2020 
Why humans have larger penises and smaller testicles than other great apes 
Viewpoint: By engineering block on Vitamin A enhanced Golden Rice, Greenpeace ‘puts the whole environmental movement into disrepute’ 
Why do people accept biotech in medicine but not GMO foods?
