Participate or pay: Legislation would allow US employers to require genetic testing of workers

GettyImages x
DNA sequencing

A little-noticed bill moving through Congress would allow companiesย to require employees to undergo genetic testing or risk paying a penalty of thousands of dollars, and would let employersย see that genetic and other health information.

Giving employers such power is now prohibited by legislation including the 2008 genetic privacy and nondiscrimination law known as GINA. The new bill gets around that landmark law by stating explicitly that GINA and other protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a โ€œworkplace wellnessโ€ program.

The bill, HR 1313, was approved by a House committee, with all 22 Republicans supporting it and all 17 Democrats opposed.

โ€œWhat this bill would do is completely take away the protections of existingย laws,โ€ said Jennifer Mathis, director of policy at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law…[However,]ย Employers say they need the changes because those two landmark laws are โ€œnot aligned in a consistent mannerโ€ with laws about workplace wellness programs.

Rigorous studies by researchers not tied to the $8 billion wellness industry have shown that [workplace wellness] programs improve employee health little if at all. An industry group recently concluded that they save so little on medical costs that, on average, the programs lose money. But employers continue to embrace them, partly as a way to shift more health care costs to workers, including by penalizing them financially.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post:ย House Republicans would let employers demand workersโ€™ genetic test results

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2025-08-25 203032
Mazzengaโ€™s 20-year old muscles: How a still-going-strong 92-year old sprinter wins every race she enters
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-10.19.30-AM
โ€˜Naturalโ€™ wellness supplements linked to liver injury
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The โ€˜shoddyโ€™ Danish couple whose 'researchโ€™ inspires RFK, Jr.โ€™s health delusion
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Credit: ACSH
Viewpoint: Who and whatโ€™s to blame for the surge in vaccine-preventable diseases?
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.44.09-PM
Viewpoint: Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario. Is that proof that climate change is a hoax, as Trump claims?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-03_24_05-PM
Misinformed parents overdosing children with Vitamin A to fight measles
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-11_54_59-AM
Why weight-loss drugs might be reducing cancer rates and making treatment more effective
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-11.05.51-AM
Can vaping lead to cancer? New โ€˜association studyโ€™ raises questions of โ€œlinks"
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.