Organic farmer says “no” to organic-led ‘New MacDonald’ GMO demonization campaign

Screen Shot at PM

Late last week, a marketing group calledย โ€œOnly Organicโ€ย launched a YouTube video calledย โ€œNew MacDonald.โ€ It depicts a group of children singing and acting out two versions of the classic song, intended to represent the differences between conventional and organic farming.

newmacdonald
Click image for larger version

Over the weekend, my Twitter feed was filled with polarized reactions. Many of the organic organizations and activists I follow shared it enthusiastically while those on the โ€œother sideโ€ were offended at the exaggerations. This dismay was accurately summarized by Dr. Steve Savage in a post on his Applied Mythology blog and reproduced on the Genetic Literacy Project, provocatively titled:ย Hate Speech For Profit: Organic Marketing Gone Bad.ย Here is the harsh dichotomy between “good” organics and “bad” conventional agriculture encapsulated in a graphic reproduced from the video:

Among the points Savageย makes:

โ€ฆthis depiction of mainstream farming isย notย โ€œplayful.โ€ โ€ฆ It is certainlyย not something that โ€œfurthers the conversation.โ€ It is a malicious distortion that demonizes the work of the small minority of citizens who still farm.

Savage then goes on to ask what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot:

To put this in perspective, imagine if there was a comparable group to โ€œOnly Organicโ€ from the โ€œConventionalโ€ side. They could hire an ad agency to produce a video and stills depicting fresh fruits, vegetables and other foods sitting in pools of fresh, steaming animal excrement or having the same coming out of a manure spreader onto a ripe crop of lettuce or strawberries. They could call Organic, โ€œPoop-based agricultureโ€ and label their own products as โ€œgrown without the use of animal fecal matter.โ€ That would, of course, be an unfair, ย nasty depiction of the organic requirement to use onlyย non-synthetic fertilizers.

(Though never done as brazenly as Savage suggests, this is, of course, also becoming a common tactic of the anti-organic movement. Iโ€™ve addressed itย before.)ย Near the end of his post, Dr. Savage makes this observation:

I donโ€™t believe that these marketing strategies reflect the ethics of real organic farmers, certainly none that Iโ€™ve met. Someone made the excellent suggestion that organic farmers could start a โ€œnot in my nameโ€ campaign to say that they donโ€™t want to see theย whole organic movement dragged down to this low level, and they donโ€™t want to see their neighbors and fellow farmers maligned.

Within a week, this video had attracted more than 400,000 hits. The tactics and perceptions of marketing efforts have always been of interest to me. Iโ€™ve addressed the topic before in posts about theย criticism of organic marketing techniquesย and most recently in a call to end this kind ofย โ€œfood fight.โ€

To a certain extent, any kind of advertising or marketing will always rely on simplified concepts and bold messages โ€“ itโ€™s the nature of the medium. And I fully support efforts to create value-added, differentiated markets. But I believe itโ€™s still fair to question the necessity of polarizing issues and the unintended consequences that can result.

In my opinion, organic marketers have no need to engage in questionable tactics. Firstly, they could instead choose to focus on the positive aspects of organic production, on the principles that serve as the foundation of the organic standards. Secondly, the organic market isย boomingย โ€“ the U.S. market grew by 11.5ย percentย in 2014 to $35.1 billion!

Simply put, demand is not the issue โ€“ supply is. Although the scope and impact of organic imports is often exaggerated by critics of organic food, the inescapable reality is that North American production is failing to keep up with the growth in the market. If the organic sector is going to continue to meet consumer expectations at the highest level of integrity with respect to its own principles, it must find a way to encourage more American and Canadian farmers to make the transition to organic production.

And hereโ€™s the real irony: campaigns like โ€œNew MacDonaldโ€ threaten to alienate the very people the organic sector needs most right now: farmers. In my opinion, itโ€™s time to start building bridges, not digging trenches.

Please let me know what you think โ€“ Iโ€™m especially interested in hearing from my friends in the organic community!

Rob Wallbridge is an organic farmer and consultant based in Western Quebec. He advocates for high-quality organic food and informed communities in agriculture. Follow him on Twitter as @songberryfarm and on his blog,ย The Fanning Mill.

 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.โ€™s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
Screenshot-2026-05-11-104424
Hantavirus outbreak research: Trump administration shut down study last year on rodent-to-human transmission
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 11.30
Despite politicized disinformation, Midwest AI data centers are fueling a solar energy boom
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challengingย 
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-11.55.47-AM
Anti-vax activists falsely blame COVID vaccines for the rising U.S. cancer rate among younger people.
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-3.40.33-PM
Seeds of power: China turns to genetic engineering to become global superpower
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.