GLP podcast: Oops — heirloom seed company markets GM tomato; Anti-biotech movement in retreat; Bill Gates does more harm than good?

v facts and fallacies cameron and liza default featured image outlined
An heirloom seed company that prides itself on selling GMO-free products mistakenly put a genetically engineered tomato on the cover of its 2024 catalog. The anti-GMO movement appears to be in permanent retreat. Is the end of the “frakenfood” scare close? Bill Gates and other billionaire philanthropists do a lot of good around the world, but their critics say this generosity has a dark side.

Podcast:

Join hosts Dr. Liza Dunn and GLP contributor Cameron English on episode 257 of Science Facts and Fallacies as they break down these latest news stories:

Heirloom seed company Baker Creek put a purple-fleshed tomato on the cover of its 2024 catalog—only to later discover that it is almost certainly genetically engineered. That’s according to Norfolk Healthy Produce, which recently commercialized its bioengineered, high-antioxidant Purple Tomato.  Norfolk says the “remarkable similarity” between the two plant varieties spurred laboratory testing which “supports the fact that the only reported way to produce a purple-fleshed tomato rich in anthocyanin antioxidants is with Norfolk’s  patented technology.” The discovery provoked an angry Facebook post from Baker Creek and raised some awkward questions about marketing GMO-free seeds.

The anti-GMO movement was a cultural force to be reckoned with a decade ago, launching dozens of GMO labeling campaigns across the US and drawing thousands of people to “march against Monsanto” protests in major cities. Today, though, the one-powerful anti-biotech campaign appears to be in retreat as it loses critical regulatory battles in Europe and public interest in its cause wanes. What led to this development? Let’s examine five possible explanations for why anti-GMO activism fell by the wayside.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The Gates Foundation seems to have been a force for good in the world since its founding in 1994. But not everyone is convinced. While the Foundation’s efforts to increase access to vaccines and boost food security around the globe are laudable, critics allege that such billionaire-backed philanthropies do more harm than good by siphoning money away from government-led efforts to address poverty. Is there any truth to this concern?

Dr. Liza Dunn is a medical toxicologist and the medical affairs lead at Bayer Crop Science. Follow her on X @DrLizaMD

Cameron J. English is the director of bio-sciences at the American Council on Science and Health. Visit his website and follow him on X @camjenglish

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.