“Arrogant” GMO promoter Professor Bruce Chassy embarasses himself at major Food Scientist’s Institute

The GMO debate has gone main stream and is becoming a very black and white issue. Promoters of genetically modified crops tout the science as ‘feeding world hunger,’ while GMO critics push for higher health standards, wanting only unmodified, whole food – food that isn’t doused in herbicide chemicals and spliced in labs with bacteria strains. At the very least, GMO critics believe genetically modified foods should be labeled for what they are.

Isn’t it important for people to know where their food comes from?

Isn’t it important for people to know that their food’s DNA has been injected and rearranged?

Read the full, original story here: “Arrogant GMO promoter Professor Bruce Chassy embarrasses himself at major Food Scientist’s Institute” 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.