Stem cells from bone marrow proved more helpful than those from bloodstream

Blood stem cells derived from donor bone marrow resulted in better self-reported psychological well-being, fewer graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) symptoms, and earlier return to work for the recipients compared with stem cells derived from the donor’s bloodstream, a study published in JAMA Oncology has shown.

[R]esearchers sought to determine if the source of stem cells — bone marrow vs peripheral blood — would improve long-term quality of life and recovery.

In the study, researchers randomized 551 people with leukemia or certain other blood malignancies, age 16 to 66 years, to receive transplanted cells derived from the donor’s bone marrow or the donor’s circulating blood. Participants were followed via periodic phone calls from 6 months to 5 years after transplantation.

Study results showed that participants who received bone marrow–derived stem cells were more likely to report better psychological well-being, and they were also more likely to have returned to work at least part-time.

“Results of this study set bone marrow as the standard source of stem cells for transplantation from unrelated donors,” said Claudio Anasetti….

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Bone Marrow vs Bloodstream: Stem Cell Source Influences Transplantation Outcomes

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.