How does whole genome sequencing really stack up?

These days, it’s faster and cheaper than ever to decipher a person’s entire DNA. But a small study suggests that looking for disease risks that way may not be ready for the masses.

For one thing, the research found that gene variants most likely linked with significant disease were the least likely to be accurately identified.
And analyzing the mass of data from the DNA scan is a daunting task, researchers said.

Some experts think more targeted gene-mapping is a better approach. But while whole genome sequencing is mostly done for research, it has far-reaching potential for diagnosing and treating genetic diseases, even in people with no known risks.

Read the full, original story: Is Gene Mapping For Disease Risk Beneficial?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.