2014: One step closer to genetically engineered athletes

Cell DNA dpi RGB r x
Image: National Institutes of Health

In the 2013 term, the United States Supreme Court held that a private company could not patent human genes.

But the Court left room for future patents in the area of genetics. A patent may be granted for “new and useful…composition of matter” as opposed to matter that is from “naturally occurring phenomena”. The possibility exists for an entity to make a new and useful composition of matter through isolating DNA.

Dare we apply that technology to making a brand of super athletes? Are we at the point where genetics and imagination and legal leeway to create gladiators in future generations?

Read the full, original story: 2014 Is a Step Closer to Genetically Engineered Athletes

Additional Resources:

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.