Opponents of GM crops like Golden Rice are ‘wicked’, says UK Environment Secretary, setting off tempest

| October 15, 2013 |
UK Environmental Secretary Owen Paterson. Via BBC News UK Environmental Secretary Owen Paterson. Via BBC News

In a sharp rebuke of opponents of GM technology, UK Environmental Secretary Owen Paterson told The Independent that those who oppose Golden Rice are “wicked…casting a shadow over attempts to feed the world.”

Despite the decades of research on the safety of GMOs and the assurance that Golden Rice will be given away for free, opponents continue to claim that it is a ‘Trojan Horse’ for GM technology that will ultimately harm human health and the environment.

Secretary Paterson, an ardent supporter of Golden Rice, said, “It’s just disgusting that little children are allowed to go blind and die because of a hang-up by a small number of people about this technology.” He reiterated that there was no scientific evidence that GMOs posed any threat to human health or the environment.

In a separate article, The Guardian pointed out that the comments by Secretary Paterson coincided with statements made by other proponents of Golden Rice, including Patrick Moore, a former high-ranking Greenpeace member who now is an activist for crop biotechnology. Moore’s non-profit organization, Allow Golden Rice Now, advocates for the innovation. Many prominent scientists, under the banner Science magazine, also condemned the vandalism of a Golden Rice field trial in the Philippines by anti-GMO activists, an attack that was supported by Greenpeace.

The Guardian‘s Karl Mathiesen set up a forum for readers to contribute to the debate, which prompted hundreds of responses, including one from Alexander J Stein, an agricultural economist with the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, DC, whose PhD focused on Golden Rice.

“The key conclusion is that Golden Rice offers a very promising intervention that could complement other current interventions, above all supplementation with vitamin A pills,” Stein wrote. He  suggested that instead of attacking GMOs by claiming health and environmental risks, critics should instead target the “framework in which GM crops are developed,” which would include “the promotion of weaker patent rights [or] the facilitation of more competition in the field of agricultural biotechnology.”

Another Guardian journalist, Claire Provost, offered more context to Secretary Paterson’s remarks, discussing the protests against this year’s World Food Prize winners, who have all have made contributions to agriculture biotechnology. One of the winners, Robert Farley, is a chief technology officer for Monsanto and another, Mary-Dell Chilton, is a scientist and founder of Syngenta Biotechnology.. “The World Food Prize has been criticized for prioritizing biotechnology over other strategies for achieving food security,” Provost wrote.

The hundreds of other comments were spread across Twitter and Facebook, encompassing a wide range of views, both negative and positive of Golden Rice.

Vitamin A deficiency affects 40% of children in the developing world and can cause serious health issues. Golden Rice, which is fortified with beta-carotene, is said to be able to provide 60% of daily required intake of vitamin A. Though there have been efforts to combat the widespread deficiency with better farming practices and food distribution, a solution using biotechnology is strongly supported by the scientific community.

Additional Resources:

  • Jackie

    Ha! Says the country with mad cow disease!!!

  • First Officer

    It’s true! Greenpeace wants no GM products, no matter what and no matter what cost. Hence, Greenpeace’s, “Make More Blind Kids for Nature”, campaign to destroy golden rice.

    I hear they have a representative in India personally thanking every kid that’s gone blind from the lack of vitamin A:

    “Thank you for going blind for nature. NEXT!”
    “Thank you for going blind for nature. NEXT!”
    “Thank you for going blind for nature. NEXT!”

    “GOD DAMN IT !, i said NEXT! Can’t you kids see where the line is? Oh, that’s right. My mistake !”

    “Thank you for going blind for nature. NEXT!”
    “Thank you for going blind for nature. NEXT!”
    “Thank you for going blind for nature. NEXT!”… 500K times a year !

    “NEXT !”

  • OrganicBrian

    It’s interesting that this article doesn’t mention at all that Golden Rice has been determined to be impractical, not by activists but by its engineers.

    Here’s an article which discusses the hysterical and biased reporting around many of these so-called GMO “successes”:

    http://www.cornucopia.org/2014/01/fakethrough-gmos-capitulation-science-journalism/

    “It perhaps doesn’t need saying that -70C storage capability and comparably fatty diets are not characteristics of those likely to be deficient in vitamin A.”

    It would be much easier to just provide vitamin supplements to these deficient populations, than to create all the conditions necessary for Golden Rice to be (marginally) helpful in preventing vitamin A deficiency.

    • http://www.jonentine.com Jon Entine

      Conucopia is an anti-science/anti-GMO NGO propaganda site. Golden Rice has not been determined to be impractical. Here is background on the latest research on the project:
      http://irri.org/golden-rice
      http://www.goldenrice.org/

    • Good4U

      Dear Organic Brian, thanks for pointing out the real agenda behind the campaign against Golden Rice. Your statement is telling: “…easier to just provide vitamin supplements to these deficient populations…” Sure, sure. You & the anti-GMO activists just want to sell the poor folks in underdeveloped countries a pile of pills. If Golden Rice had been allowed to be deployed on schedule, free of charge, its human health protective properties would have put you out of business. You and the so-called cornucopia website that you cited nothing but a swarm of ruthless buzzards that intend to make a fortune off the backs of poor people who can’t even see. Ugh!

      • OrganicBrian

        Wut?

        I don’t have any stake in nutrition supplements, I personally don’t care how many are sold. I was just saying that if the goal was fixing Vitamin A deficiency, that could have been achieved far cheaper and a lot sooner.

        Everything in your comment was rhetoric. If anything in the Cornucopia article is not correct, then what? GR “deployed on schedule”: is there something I don’t know about the engineering challenges having been overcome? I could not find any info that would lead me to believe they’ve solved the major problems with it. If GR is not being grown now for consumption, that really has nothing to do with activisim, AFAIK.